Currently the ISSF Academy operates three international coaching licences each designed to bring coaches to a specific level of expertise and international standards.
Coaching Licences are awarded at three levels of the educational Programme:
- Basic Course for an ISSF Coaching Licence - 'C'
- Intermediate Course for an ISSF Coaching Licence - 'B'
- Advanced Course for an ISSF Coaching Licence - 'A'
The ISSF Academy has also produced a ‘D’ course for use by local federations in creating a regional coaching structure for national federations.
ISSF Regional Course for Coaches - 'D'
The 'D' course is designed to run on a national or regional basis using locally based tutors and Course material provided by the ISSF TA that is translated into the local language by the organising local federation. The purpose of the D Course is to provide a localised coaching structure for regional national federations. Participants are awarded an ISSF certificate upon successful completion of the course. It is to the discretion of the local national federations to issue additional certification to reflect the course within their national coaching structure.
ISSF Basic course for an ISSF Coaching Licence - 'C'
The minimum entrance requirement to attend the 'C' Course is that the applicant is the holder of a national coaching licence from the respective member federation of the ISSF or to have attended a comparable educational programme (e.g. either for academic/graduate sport teachers, sport officers and scientists, or have been an international level ISSF shooter). The successful completion of a 'D' Course may be considered as part of the application process for acceptance onto the ‘C’ licence course. Completion of a ‘D’ course on its own is no guarantee of acceptance.
ISSF Intermediate/Advanced course for an ISSF Coaching Licence - 'B', ‘A’
The successful completion of the basic Course ('C' Course) is a requirement for admission to a 'B' Coaching Course. Similarly, successful completion of the 'B' Course is a requirement for admission to the 'A' Coaching Course.
Each individual Course is conducted over a period of 7-10 days consisting of 45-60 teaching units. The Courses will be held (wherever possible) at locations that offer facilities for both theoretical and practical work.
The Courses are delivered in part-time mode using a combination of distance learning and residential sessions. This mode of study enables coaches based throughout the world to remain in full time employment throughout their studies.
3.1 Admissions to Courses
The TA selects appropriate students for each Course. All applicants to a Course have to receive the written endorsement of their National Federation (recognised by the ISSF) as a prior condition of acceptance. Potential applicants for the ‘A’, ‘B’, and ‘C’ Courses should complete an ISSF TA application form (incorporating an endorsement by their Federation and appending basic curriculum vitae (CV), which will be reviewed by the ISSF TA Co-ordinator TAC) and TA Lecturers (TAL). In reaching its decision on admissions, the TA will consider the extent to which it believes a student would be successful on the Course.
3.1.1 Course Co-ordinator (TAC)
(TAC) in consultation with the ISSF, will be responsible for:
- arrangements for the recruitment and selection of students in co-ordination with TAL
- overall monitoring of the Course
- arrangements for assessment and liaison with the Assessment Panel
- co-ordinating the delivery of Course material according to the different Course programmes
- ensuring the coherence of the student experience within and between each level in co-ordination with TAL
- setting timescales and deadlines for the completion and submission of homework. Dates will be published and circulated by the ISSF.
- arrangements for the accommodation and local transportation at the Course location.
3.1.2 TA Lecturers (TAL)
Each discipline and unit (specialisation) has a person responsible for its management, delivery and implementation. They will be nominated by ISSF TA. In addition the TAL will be responsible for:
- co-ordination of documentation associated with the discipline/unit for which they are responsible
- liaison and co-ordination with TAC to ensure a coherent student learning experience within the discipline/unit
- assurance of high quality teaching support to the unit
- organisation of the assessment for each discipline/unit, its grading and the collation of marks and other materials in accordance with the assessment scheme validated for that discipline/unit
- monitoring and evaluation of the discipline/unit in the light of its intended learning outcomes
3.1.3 Evaluation of Student Experiences
Following the completion of each Course students will complete an evaluation, independent from TAL, on the quality and provision of content, delivery, resources, assessment and management of the Course. The Course Leader TAC will compile a summary of student evaluations in a report together with a staff perspective and recommendations for action or change. TA evaluation reports will be copied to the ISSF Executive Committee.
3.1.4 General Assessment Criteria
The nature of assessment varies between Courses to provide a range of assessment methods across each level of the Courses. This includes written essay style responses, multiple choice questions, oral presentations and homework written for specific audiences such as other coaches or athletes.
The purpose of assessment is to enable students to demonstrate that they have fulfilled the objectives of the programme and achieved the standard required for the coaching Licence they seek. The process of assessment is detailed in the ISSF TA Course Handbook that will be distributed to students at the start of their Course of study. The Handbook is approved by the ISSF Executive Committee and will be subject to regular review.
Work submitted for assessment will be graded according to the assessment criteria described within the TA Handbook. Assessed work not handed in by the published date, without an approved prior extension from the TA due to bona fide causes, will normally receive a zero grade (0%).
In all matters relating to assessment the ISSF recognises that assessment is a matter of judgement, not simply of computation. Marks, grades and percentages are not absolute values but symbols used by tutors to communicate their judgement of different aspects of a student's work, in order to provide information on which the final decision on a student's fulfilment of Course objectives may be based.
Critical evaluation and constructive comments together with marks are provided to students on standardised assessment feedback forms. Students also receive information as to the overall range of scores within the Course to provide a comparison for their work.
3.1.4.1 General criteria
In assessing written submissions and presentation of homework at all levels, the following general criteria will be applied as appropriate:
- Organisation: There should be clear evidence that a logical framework was used to prepare for and, if appropriate, complete the homework. There should be evidence that the student has a clear grasp of the topic that the work has been well planned using all relevant sources of knowledge and/or approaches, is carried out meticulously and reported in an appropriate format with sufficient coverage of the key points. The assessment should conform to the pre-stated limits of time or length and the materials covered should embrace all the main aspects. There should be no errors and/or major omissions.
- Knowledge and Relevance: There should be evidence that the student fully understands the topic(s) under consideration. This may take the form of a critical appraisal but it should also be a clear statement about an issue/task in the student's own words. Wherever appropriate there should be evidence that the student can relate relevant theory and current or future practice. Students with an exceptional background should also be able to integrate relevant material from different fields/areas.
- Analysis and Synthesis: It should be obvious that the student is fully aware of the relationships between various areas/topics. Concluding statements should be precise, easily understood and appropriate. Students should be able to combine a wide range of information sources and show an ability to apply their knowledge to real life situations and practice. There should be evidence of a critical appraisal and an awareness of how best to solve problems that may have occurred in the past or that may arise in the future. Purely descriptive accounts should be limited and their assessment should reveal both depth and breadth of knowledge.
- Presentation: The style of presentation should be acceptable and appropriate.. Written work should follow the recommended format and oral communications should employ an effective method. References should be submitted in a suitable style and the quality of homework presentation should be professional. Details are included in the TA Student handbook.
3.1.5 Reconsideration of Decisions
The TA Assessment Panel will reconsider its decision(s):
- if a candidate requests such a reconsideration and establishes that their performance in the assessment was adversely affected by illness. The candidate's request must be supported by medical certificates or other documentary evidence acceptable to the ISSF TA.
- if the TA is satisfied on evidence produced by a candidate or any other person that there has been a material administrative error, or that the assessments were not conducted in accordance with the regulations for the Course.
A copy of the procedures is included in the TA Handbook issued to students at the commencement of the Course. In the event of any disagreement with the actions and decision of the Panel, the ISSF Executive Committee member responsible for the TA shall take the final decision. If appropriate, they may refer any decision to the ISSF Executive Committee, whose decision shall be final and binding.
3.1.6 Discretion
The TA Assessment Panel shall have the discretion to reach such a decision in respect of a candidate's assessment(s) and award, as they may deem appropriate, having regard for the need to ensure that natural justice is done to individual students and that the standards of ISSF TA awards are maintained.
Homework not submitted by the deadline set by the TA (or as previously agreed with a candidate in advance of the Course) will not be assessed and will receive a zero grade (0%).
3.1.7 Re-assessment
The reassessment of a student shall be at the discretion of the Assessment Panel. The Panel shall not unreasonably withhold permission for a student to be reassessed in accordance with TA Course regulations.
Candidates, who fail to satisfy the Panel in the assessment for the award, may be reassessed once only in any or all of the units of assessment, at the discretion of the Panel.
The Panel will determine the timing and extent of any re-assessment.
No reassessment shall be permitted for a student to improve upon a mark or grading above the pass level required for the award for which the student is a candidate.